Having disparaged five of the seven churches in the
aforementioned benefice (see previous post) my sense of guilt and balance
drives me to write flatteringly about the two churches that were open that day. And so I came to a jewel in an ecclesiastical
crown that is Throckmorton Chapelry.
The name Throckmorton (a family name) comes from the
Anglo-Saxon word Throc (which means drain) so this is really Morton’s Drain.
Mee goes even further and writes that “it
is said to derive from a stretch of water with a wooden platform for washing.” [1] Really? Washing what? He is also somewhat dismissive of the hamlet
saying just two sentences later, “The
only feature of the place is the church.”
Historically he is inaccurate for there is a splendid Tudor house, now
Court Farm, and two ancient moats. There
are also excellent examples of timbered cottages, as well as the typical
Worcestershire red brick. And for those
who like poking around WW2 sites there is the adjacent airfield which was RAF
Pershore . Built in 1940 it was a base
for Wellington bombers, housed Vulcan bombers in the 1960s, and remains partially
operational. On a diocesan note, until the Victorian age Throckmorton was in
the parish of Fladbury to the south, but boundaries and pairings have all
changed many times. And there was and is
no saintly dedication.
The church, which carries the title of Chapelry (i.e. It
was annexed to a primary parish church), is approached over a modern cattle grid
with wooden side gate, and up an unpaved track lined beautifully with young
trees. All around is farmland and the
noise of hens and sheep drown out the birdsong!
And because beasts and fowl roam this glebe that is without clearly
defined paths let the pilgrim or visitor be warned. There are perils underfoot. Everywhere.
The church of THROCKMORTON
consists of a chancel 12½ ft. by 16 ft., a central tower 11½ ft. by 13½ ft., a
nave about 45 ft. by 17½ ft., and a small south aisle 4½ ft. in width. These
measurements are all internal. [2] The first sight of the building is one
of those “Wow!” moments, for the tower is central and it’s immediately apparent
that this is ancient stone. In fact much of the building is 13th
century, but even that was a “later” building.
Damp-proofing work, the bane of all clergy and PCCs, revealed earlier
stone foundations. And county
archeologists have identified a Saxon village on higher ground and a possible
wooden church site. So this is an old Christian
site indeed.
As if we needed more proof of antiquity there are records
of monks at “a minster” (Fladbury?
Pershore?) sending priests here in AD 697.
This is a beautifully ordered church. The font is of uncertain pedigree, plain and
plastered over, and has been moved at least once from its original soak-away
drain. Mee says it is “thought to be Norman, altered at a later
time.” [3] There is clear evidence of a pre-Reformation rood screen, as
well as doors and windows being closed up over centuries. The medieval chancel is quite magnificent
with two Tudor chairs and a small piscina of trefoil design on the south wall.
(And no, it didn’t hold flowers!) And
the place is light – there is no stained glass.
Three gems?
Firstly the tower itself, about which a history book could be written
about its changes over time. Second the four gargoyles on the upper storey of
the tower – the 15th century belfry.
One of a monkey, one of a monster, one of a man with a very large nose
(said to be a bishop!) and one of a lion.
(There is also a corbel of a man’s face now resting on a window ledge,
the victim of a zealous puritan.) Sadly
my limited camera that day could not capture these high carvings so you’re just
going to have to take my word for it!
And oddly enough in third place is the fact that the
church still lights its way using oil lamps and candles due to the lack of
electricity.
On to Bishampton, shortly…
[1.] The King’s England.
Worcestershire. Arthur Mee. 1968
New Edition. Page 168.
[2.] A History of the County of Worcester. 1913. Volume
3.
[3.] Mee. Ibid.
OS Grid Reference.
SO980496
No comments:
Post a Comment